Abstract

Glyphosate is the main component of many broadly used herbicides due to its safety for humans and animals. It is known that the remains of glyphosate are present in allowable doses in fodders and food products, and, consumrd in low doses, it is found in insignificant amounts in milk, eggs and even in the internal organs (liver, kidneys) of animals. For determining combined impact of glyphosate and the commonest food additives on the composition of microbiota of animals, four groups of laboratory male rats were formed, which during 42 days consumed pure water without any restrictions; 1% aqueous solution of glyphosate; 1% solution of glyphosate in combination with 1% solution of sodium benzoate; 1% solution of glyphosate with 1% solution of saccharin. After killing the animals, 1 g of feces were collected and by serial dilutions with 10–1 to 10–9 sterile physiologic solution, a microbiological analysis was undertaken. Out of each dilution an inoculation of the studied material to the elective growth media was performed, by 0.1 cm3, then the material was incubated in a thermostat (24–72 hours, temperature 37 °С), the results were recorded after 24–72 h. The microorganisms were identified by studying morphological parameters, tinctorial, cultural and enzymic properties. Results are provided in CFU/g (colony-forming unit per gramm) of feces. The impact of glyphosate and glyphosate with food additives led to no changes in the number of Escherichia coli and emergence of this species of microorganism with changed enzymic activity. Also no changes occurred in the number of microorganisms of Bifidobactrium and Lactobacillus spp. Addition of glyphosate, and also glyphosate in combination with saccharin to the diet contributes to broader reproduction of microorganisms of Klebsiella, Citrobacter, Enterobacter and Pseudomonas genera. Mixtures of glyphosate and food additives allow conditionally pathogenic yeast-like Candida fungi (Candida glabrata and C. albicans) to spread more widely in the intestine. Significant fluctuations in the number of Enterococcus spp. bacteria genus were observed: by 80 times within range of each of the three experimental groups of rats with addition of herbicide with benzoate and saccharin to the diet.

Highlights

  • Over the process of evolution, microbial associations which make up the normal gut microbiota have been formed, which is one of the mechanisms of maintaining homeostasis of macroorganisms (Prakash et al, 2011; Molozhavaya et al, 2016)

  • The research was performed on male white rats, which were divided into four groups with five animals in each: I group – intact animals which consumed pure water, II group – rats which were given aqueous solution of glyphosate, animals of III and IV groups, which in 1:1 proportion were given aqueous solution of glyphosate with 1% solution of sodium benzoate and 1% solution of glyphosate with 1% aqueous solution of saccharin, respectively

  • The conducted studies have determined the main representatives of the intestinal microbiome of the tested animals (Fig. 1): bacteria of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Lactoсoccus, Escherichia, Proteus, Enterococcus, Citrobacter, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Сlostridium, Staphylococcus, Candida genera

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the process of evolution, microbial associations which make up the normal gut microbiota have been formed, which is one of the mechanisms of maintaining homeostasis of macroorganisms (Prakash et al, 2011; Molozhavaya et al, 2016). Administration of a large amount of antibacterial preparations, irrational and non-balanced diet, stresses, toxic substances in the components of food and food products, which accumulate at all stages of agricultural and industrial production, and other factors can lead to change in the quantitative and qualitative composition of the gut microbiota (Prakash et al, 2011; Rothschild et al, 2018; Licht & Bahl, 2018). Data have been obtained showing that the impact of herbicides in doses which are considered safe can change gut microbiota of animals in early stages of the development, especially before attaining sexual maturity (Mao et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call