Abstract

Environmental protection initiatives and increasing market demand for green practices are driving the meat processing industry to consider sustainable methods for wastewater treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. On- site treatment is the preferred option to treat the slaughterhouse effluents for water reuse and potential energy recovery due to the conversion of organics into biogas. A thorough review of advancements in slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics, treatment, and management in the meat processing industry, environmental impacts, health effects, and regulatory frameworks relevant to the slaughterhouse wastewater management is presented in this study. Significant progress in high-rate anaerobic treatment, nutrient removal, advanced oxidation processes, and combined processes for an actual slaughterhouse wastewater treatment are highlighted. The optimization of individual and combined processes was performed in this study using quadratic modeling, degradation mechanisms, and response surface methodology to maximize CH4 yield and the removal of TOC and TN while minimizing TSS and H2O2 residuals. The effects of the flow rate, pH, influent TOC concentration, H2O2 dosage, and their interaction on the overall treatment efficiency and CH4 yield were studied. In the final part of this study, an optimized combined anaerobic–aerobic and UV/H2O2 system with recycle was evaluated using a cost- effectiveness analysis by minimizing treatment time, electrical energy consumption, and the overall incurred treatment costs. The agreement between model predictions and experimental values indicated that the proposed models could describe the performance of individual and combined systems for actual SWW treatment. The maximum TOC and TN removals of 91.29 and 86.05%, CH4 yield of 55.72%, and minimum H2O2 residual of 1.45% were found at optimum conditions of influent TOC concentration of 626 mg/L, feed flow rate of 45 mL/min, H2O2 dosage of 350 mg/L, and pH of 6.59. The minimum total retention time was determined to be 10 h with individual residence times of 6.82 h, 2.40 h, and 47 min in the ABR, AS bioreactor, and UV/H2O2 photoreactor, respectively. A minimum electrical power consumption of 0.0194 kWh for an overall treatment cost of 0.12 $/m3 were obtained based on the cost-effectiveness analysis. Results show that the application of combined biological and advanced oxidation processes is useful for on-site slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Keywords: Slaughterhouse wastewater, anaerobic digestion, activated sludge, advanced oxidation processes, process optimization, cost-effectiveness analysis.

Highlights

  • Water and wastewater treatment has become crucial for the continuing development of current society

  • A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was used to determine the best alternative for slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) treatment from six different systems evaluated in this economic study including UV/H2O2, activated sludge (AS), anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), combined ABR-AS, combined AS-ABR, and combined ABRAS-UV/H2O2 processes

  • The feed flow rate was found to be significant on the percent total organic carbon (TOC) removal, total nitrogen (TN) removal, and total suspended solids (TSS) residual; and the pH was found to be significant on percent TN removal and biogas yield

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water and wastewater treatment has become crucial for the continuing development of current society. The decreasing availability of freshwater resources along with the growing population has rearranged the objectives in the wastewater treatment field from disposal to reuse and recycling. The increasing growth of world population has augmented the pollution of freshwater due to the inadequate discharge of wastewater, especially in developing countries (US EPA, 2004; Leitão et al., 2006; Gopala Krishna et al, 2009; Feng et al, 2009). For this reason, water and wastewater treatment has become crucial for the continuing development of the society. Given the differences in location, economic resources, living standards of different countries, and characteristics of water and its pollutants, many nations adopt diverse techniques for water and wastewater treatment (Daigger, 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call