Abstract

Observation and imagery of movement both activate similar brain regions to those involved in movement execution. As such, both are recommended as techniques for aiding the recovery of motor function following stroke. Traditionally, action observation and movement imagery (MI) have been considered as independent intervention techniques. Researchers have however begun to consider the possibility of combining the two techniques into a single intervention strategy. This study investigated the effect of combined action observation and MI on corticospinal excitability, in comparison to either observation or imagery alone. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the hand representation of the left motor cortex during combined action observation and MI, passive observation (PO), or MI of right index finger abduction-adduction movements or control conditions. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles of the right hand. The combined action observation and MI condition produced MEPs of larger amplitude than were obtained during PO and control conditions. This effect was only present in the FDI muscle, indicating the facilitation of corticospinal excitability during the combined condition was specific to the muscles involved in the observed/imagined task. These findings have implications for stroke rehabilitation, where combined action observation and MI interventions may prove to be more effective than observation or imagery alone.

Highlights

  • Research using neuroimaging techniques (e.g., Grèzes and Decety, 2001; Filimon et al, 2007; Munzert et al, 2008) has indicated that several cortical areas shown to be active during movement execution are active during the action observation and imagery of movement

  • Pairwise comparisons showed Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitudes recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle during AO+movement imagery (MI) were significantly higher than passive observation (PO) (p = 0.04) and all three control conditions

  • MEP amplitudes recorded from the FDI muscle during MI were significantly higher than during the control conditions of Static Hand (SH) (p = 0.01) and Movement Observation (MO) (p = 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research using neuroimaging techniques (e.g., Grèzes and Decety, 2001; Filimon et al, 2007; Munzert et al, 2008) has indicated that several cortical areas shown to be active during movement execution are active during the action observation and imagery of movement. These areas include the dorsal pre-motor cortex, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, superior parietal lobe, intraparietal sulcus, and cerebellum. One method that has been used to investigate the effects of action observation and imagery independently on the human motor system is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call