Abstract

Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors that control metazoan development and cell differentiation. In Drosophila, PcG proteins form five distinct complexes targeted to genes by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). Of all PcG complexes PhoRC is the only one that contains a sequence-specific DNA binding subunit (PHO or PHOL), which led to a model that places PhoRC at the base of the recruitment hierarchy. Here we demonstrate that in vivo PHO is preferred to PHOL as a subunit of PhoRC and that PHO and PHOL associate with PREs and a subset of transcriptionally active promoters. Although the binding to the promoter sites depends on the quality of recognition sequences, the binding to PREs does not. Instead, the efficient recruitment of PhoRC to PREs requires the SFMBT subunit and crosstalk with Polycomb Repressive Complex 1. We find that human YY1 protein, the ortholog of PHO, binds sites at active promoters in the human genome but does not bind most PcG target genes, presumably because the interactions involved in the targeting to Drosophila PREs are lost in the mammalian lineage. We conclude that the recruitment of PhoRC to PREs is based on combinatorial interactions and propose that such a recruitment strategy is important to attenuate the binding of PcG proteins when the target genes are transcriptionally active. Our findings allow the appropriate placement of PhoRC in the PcG recruitment hierarchy and provide a rationale to explain why YY1 is unlikely to serve as a general recruiter of mammalian Polycomb complexes despite its reported ability to participate in PcG repression in flies.

Highlights

  • Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are critical regulators of metazoan development and cell differentiation [1,2,3,4]

  • We find that the sequence specific binding of PHO is not a primary determinant for recruitment of Pho Repressive Complex (PhoRC) to Polycomb Response Elements (PREs), which depends on the non-DNA binding subunit SFMBT and cross-talk with another PcG complex, PRC1

  • We propose that the recruitment based on combinatorial interactions enables the conditional binding of PcG proteins, which is important for switching the state of the target genes from repressed to active

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are critical regulators of metazoan development and cell differentiation [1,2,3,4]. Their best understood role is to repress key developmental genes that trigger alternative programs of genome expression in cells where these programs should not be executed [4]. In addition to PRC1 and PRC2, three other complexes, PhoRC, dRAF and PR-DUB have been implicated in PcG regulation in Drosophila where PcG repression was first discovered and most studied [11,12,13]. DRAF shares some subunits with PRC1 and is a H2AK119 monoubiquitylase while PR-DUB possesses a specific H2AK119 de-ubiquitylase activity [12,13] In addition to PRC1 and PRC2, three other complexes, PhoRC, dRAF and PR-DUB have been implicated in PcG regulation in Drosophila where PcG repression was first discovered and most studied [11,12,13]. dRAF shares some subunits with PRC1 and is a H2AK119 monoubiquitylase while PR-DUB possesses a specific H2AK119 de-ubiquitylase activity [12,13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.