Abstract

Constitutively activated signaling molecules are often the primary drivers of malignancy, and are favored targets for therapeutic intervention. However, the effectiveness of targeted inhibition of cell signaling can be blunted by compensatory signaling which generates adaptive resistance mechanisms and reduces therapeutic responses. Therefore, it is important to identify and target these compensatory pathways with combinations of targeted agents to achieve durable clinical benefit. In this report, we demonstrate the use of high-throughput combinatorial drug screening as a discovery tool to identify compensatory pathways that generate resistance to the cytotoxic effects of targeted therapy. We screened 420 drug combinations in 14 different cell lines representing three cancer lineages, and assessed the ability of each combination to cause synergistic cytotoxicity. Drug substitution studies were used to validate the functionally important drug targets. Of the 84 combinations that caused robust synergy in multiple cell lines, none were synergistic in more than half of the lines tested, and we observed no pattern of lineage specificity in the observed synergies. This reflects the plasticity of cell signaling networks, even among cell lines of the same tissue of origin. Mechanistic analysis of one novel synergistic combination identified in the screen, the multi-kinase inhibitor Ro31-8220 and lapatinib, demonstrated compensatory crosstalk between the p70S6 kinase and EGF receptor pathways. In addition, we identified BAD as a node of convergence between these two pathways that may be playing a role in the enhanced apoptosis observed upon combination treatment.

Highlights

  • Dysregulation of cell signaling networks caused by mutationally altered proteins drives the biological transformations that constitute the hallmarks of cancer [1]

  • The library contained protein kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of other enzymatic processes such as deacetylation, methylation and dephosphorylation, and general chemotherapeutic agents. Each of these inhibitors was tested in combination with seven “primary” inhibitors, which were selected based on a literature search of commonly drugged targets in various cancers. This approach gave us a matrix of 420 drug combinations, which were tested in fourteen cancer cell lines, representing three distinct epithelial cancer lineages (prostate cancer (CaP), bladder cancer (BC), and head and neck cancer (HNC))

  • Since androgen deprivation is a standard of care for prostate cancer patients, we assessed the responses of these cell lines in both the presence and absence of R1881, a synthetic androgen, in order to better recapitulate the in vivo conditions associated with therapy of this type of cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dysregulation of cell signaling networks caused by mutationally altered proteins drives the biological transformations that constitute the hallmarks of cancer [1]. Identification of these oncogenic drivers provides an opportunity for therapeutic intervention using targeted agents [2]. Due to the robustness of the signaling networks, it will be necessary to inhibit the primary drivers of oncogenesis, and one or more of the compensatory signaling modules. We term these secondary drivers “backseat drivers”. Identifying these secondary targets represents a major challenge in developing rational www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call