Abstract

BackgroundGiven that there is a possibility of a human H5N1 pandemic and the fact that the recent H5N1 viruses are resistant to the anti-viral drugs, newer strategies for effective therapy are warranted. Previous studies show that single mAbs in immune prophylaxis can be protective against H5N1 infection. But a single mAb may not be effective in neutralization of a broad range of different strains of H5N1 and control of potential neutralization escape mutants.Methods/Principal FindingsWe selected two mAbs which recognized different epitopes on the hemagglutinin molecule. These two mAbs could each neutralize in vitro escape mutants to the other and in combination could effectively neutralize viruses from clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4, 7 and 8 of influenza A H5N1 viruses. This combination of chimeric mAbs when administered passively, pre or post challenge with 10 MLD50 (50% mouse lethal dose) HPAI H5N1 influenza A viruses could protect 100% of the mice from two different clades of viruses (clades 1 and 2.1). We also tested the efficacy of a single dose of the combination of mAbs versus two doses. Two doses of the combination therapy not only affected early clearance of the virus from the lung but could completely prevent lung pathology of the H5N1 infected mice. No escape variants were detected after therapy.Conclusions/SignificanceOur studies provide proof of concept that the synergistic action of two or more mAbs in combination is required for preventing the generation of escape mutants and also to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of passive therapy against H5N1 infection. Combination therapy may allow for a lower dose of antibody to be administered for passive therapy of influenza infection and hence can be made available at reduced economic costs during an outbreak.

Highlights

  • The recent emergence of H5N1 strains of influenza A virus and the high mortality caused by them in humans has raised concerns for the possibility of a future influenza pandemic

  • Conclusions/Significance: Our studies provide proof of concept that the synergistic action of two or more monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in combination is required for preventing the generation of escape mutants and to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of passive therapy against H5N1 infection

  • Based on the results of the Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, mAbs 2D9 and 4C2 were chosen for further studies due to their high HI activity against a wide range of rescued reassortant viruses from different clades

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recent emergence of H5N1 strains of influenza A virus and the high mortality caused by them in humans has raised concerns for the possibility of a future influenza pandemic. Vaccine strategies requiring endogenous synthesis of antibodies will not provide the immediate protection needed against H5N1 infections in the event of a pandemic. Isolation of drug-resistant viral strains [3,4] in the recent past warrants an urgent need for alternative strategies for treatment and prophylaxis. Passive administration of antibodies against neutralizing epitopes of H5N1 may be an attractive alternative to active vaccination of humans, in particular for those individuals who are at high risk from influenza infection, viz. Given that there is a possibility of a human H5N1 pandemic and the fact that the recent H5N1 viruses are resistant to the anti-viral drugs, newer strategies for effective therapy are warranted. Previous studies show that single mAbs in immune prophylaxis can be protective against H5N1 infection. A single mAb may not be effective in neutralization of a broad range of different strains of H5N1 and control of potential neutralization escape mutants

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.