Abstract
There are many studies findings on patient positioning efficiency using SGRT. In our clinic, we have 80 patients in average per linear accelerator. Hence, we would like to further develop the positioning method by combining the functions from both LINAC and SGRT system to investigate its potential in positioning accuracy and setup time.There was 40 thoracic cancer patients were selected randomly and divided into 2 groups. Controlled group (Group A) with a total of 20 patients who were aligned based on skin marking. The patient was aligned to the CT reference plane by the therapists using hands. Then, the therapists did the manual calculations for each patient for the isocenter shifts. The other 20 patients, the experimental group (Group B), who were first aligned to the reference plane along their nipples across the vac-bag marking to ensure patient's position in longitudinal direction and patient was nicely fit into the vac-bag. Next, the therapist introduced the first step of auto-positioning and second step with 'move couch' function to the isocenter position. CBCT images were taken in both groups and shifts in translational and rotational were recorded. All systematic and random errors were analyzed as well as setup time.Total of 208 and 199 CBCT images in group A and B were analyzed. The mean shifts errors for group A and B were 0.36cm, 0.27cm and 0.44cm (lat, lng and vrt) and 0.89˚, 0.98˚ and 0.76˚ (pitch, roll and rtn) and 0.23cm, 0.10cm and 0.16cm (lat, lng and vrt) and 0.63˚, 0.5˚ and 0.57˚ (pitch, roll and rtn) respectively. Group B is superior in positioning accuracy than Group A in all directions. The results also shown the average setup time for Group A and B were 118 second and 89 seconds respectively. It is statistical significance (P < 0.05).New positioning method using combination of auto-positioning by both LINAC and SGRT system has proven to improve our workflow efficiency and setup accuracy greatly. It eliminates the need of isocenter shift manual calculation, which substantially reduced the potential of human error-induced radiation incidence. This new positioning method is adapted in our clinic to replace the current patient positioning workflow.Z. Cui: None.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.