Abstract
BackgroundThe early diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis is crucial for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the diagnosis of LN metastasis mainly dependent on 18F-FDG PET/CT (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography) which exhibited high false positive/negative rate.Material/MethodsIn retrospective analysis, 135 patients with NSCLC from February 2014 to March 2017 were enrolled. Based on the pathological examination, 71 patients were distributed to the LN Metastasis Group while 64 patients were distributed to the No LN Metastasis Group. Data from 18F-FDG PET/CT and tumor marker (TM) examination were collected to establish a logistic model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis set the threshold of diagnostic factors. Finally, the diagnostic values of these factors were verified in a prospective analysis that included 78 patients with NSCLC from July 2017 to April 2019.ResultsIn our retrospective analysis, compared with the No LN Metastasis Group, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)/size of primary lesion, the CT value/SUVmax/short diameter of LN, the level of TM were all significantly different than the LN Metastasis Group (All P<0.05). Our logistic model showed that SUVmax of primary lesion (odds ratio [OR]=1.491), short diameter of LN (OR=1.310) and grade of TM (OR=2.927) were significant variables. The ROC curve analysis showed the specificity and sensitivity of our logistic model was 90.6% and 90.1%, respectively. In our prospective analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the logistic model were calculated as 85.7%, 90.9%, 87.2%, 96.0%, and 71.4%, respectively.ConclusionsOur study found that combining 18F-FDG PET/CT data and TM to establish a logistic model performed better in the diagnosis of LN metastasis with low false positive/negative rates in patients with NSCLC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.