Abstract

PurposeThis meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) in hormonal receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov., ASCO, ESMO and AACR databases from inception to October 10, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET to single-agent ET with no treatment-line restriction. The main outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs).ResultsOf 938 identified studies, 9 RCTs with 5043 women were eligible and included. Compared with ET alone, CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET combination improved in PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.59, p< 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.85, p< 0.00001), regardless of ET strategies (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50–0.59 in PFS; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.85 in OS), treatment line of advanced disease (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46–0.59 in PFS; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.85 in OS) and menopausal status (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50–0.58 in PFS; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84 in OS). Higher risk of grade 3/4 AEs (RR 2.66, 95% CI 2.44–2.90, p < 0.00001) were observed in the combination group than in the ET group.ConclusionsCombination therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET prolongs survival in HR+/ HER2- ABC. This combination is a better therapeutic strategy than endocrine monotherapy in HR+/HER2- ABC, regardless of treatment line, menopausal status and other individual characteristics.

Highlights

  • As the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women, breast cancer is responsible for the highest cancer-related mortality [1]

  • Compared with Endocrine therapy (ET) alone, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and ET combination improved in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.59, p< 0.00001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.77, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.69– 0.85, p< 0.00001), regardless of ET strategies (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50–0.59 in PFS; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69–0.85 in OS), treatment line of advanced disease (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46– 0.59 in PFS; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.85 in OS) and menopausal status (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50–0.58 in PFS; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84 in OS)

  • This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sought to establish the effects of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET compared with single-agent ET on the key outcomes of PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs)

Read more

Summary

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov., ASCO, ESMO and AACR databases from inception to October 10, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET to single-agent ET with no treatment-line restriction. The main outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs)

Results
Conclusions
Introduction
56 Subsequent-line
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call