Abstract

Abstract : Over the years, organizations such as the Hezbollah, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and the Algerian Front de Liberation Nationale (FLN) have provided examples of successful frameworks for the development of violent non-state actors that have the ability to influence populations inside a nation-state. In many instances, these organizations are complex and sometimes maintain state sponsorship links outside of the nation-state itself. Furthermore, well-equipped militias and quasi-governmental frameworks provide services to the local populace in order to broaden the violent non-state organization's political influence in the area. In fact, some incidents indicate that the populace often depends solely upon these organizations for their fundamental needs to include food, water, sanitation, and security. Understanding this evolving process, however, and the mechanisms that lead to the existence of these groups is critical in formulating adequate responses and effectively countering the influential growth of these organizations. As noted in the 2006 Israeli response in Lebanon, understanding the enemy and their organizational design is merely one piece of the larger puzzle. Indeed, fully comprehending ones own organizational limitations and biases is critical in the development of sound strategies to counter the growing influence of non-state actors. In fact, recent developments in South America's Tri-Border Area (TBA) involving organizations like Hezbollah and al-Qaeda illustrate a growing need to redefine western models and approaches in countering these groups. In doing so, new flexible and unstructured techniques are developed that help reformulate the fundamental tools used by nations in identifying and solving issues in emerging hotspots.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call