Abstract

Forest resource co-management, a new management model introduced from foreign countries, was implemented for more than ten years in China. However, forest resource co-management is currently in a practice and exploration stage. This research compares two contradicting research cases that have the same physical environment and management institutions to further understand co-management mechanisms and practical operations. By linking Ostrom's eight design principles with the actor-centered power theory, this research attempts to explain the success and failure of co-management from institutional arrangement and power theory research perspectives. Based on a series of research surveys, our research shows that the success or failure of forest resource co-management depends not only on the soundness of the co-management institution itself (from the power theory point of view) but also on whether the co-management institution can obtain support from local power actors. More specifically, the success or failure of forest resource co-management depends on whether co-management mechanisms can meet the interests of the local power actors, which are a key factor for deciding the co-management implementation success.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.