Abstract
This paper examines the prose preface to Columella’s De re rustica Book 10 as a ‘paratext’ to the verse book proper, and questions the impact of this framing strategy on our perception of the garden-as-text within the realm of agronomic literature. This analysis reveals two distinct, but interrelated, ways in which Columella frames Book 10: first, as a direct and important response to Virgil’s gardening excursus in the Georgics (4.116–48); and, second, as a small part-payment towards the completion of his own agricultural treatise. In order to explain this literary paradox, I propose Derrida’s concept of the supplement as a means of articulating the place of the hortus in the tension between Columella, his sources, and his attempt to create a new definitive agricultural treatise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
