Abstract
Previous studies comparing colour constancy across diverse illumination changes have drawn an inconclusive picture 1-3 as it is not yet firmly established if typical illumination changes, which are likely to occur during a daily routine (e.g. change between daylight and tungsten), lead to higher levels of colour constancy than atypical ones. Using a real surface matching task we investigated if either (a) the learning illuminant or (b) the nature of illumination change (typical vs atypical) had an effect on observers’ colour constancy performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
