Abstract

Let $c:E\to\{1,\ldots,k\}$ be an edge colouring of a connected graph $G=(V,E)$. Each vertex $v$ is endowed with a naturally defined pallet under $c$, understood as the multiset of colours incident with $v$. If $\delta(G)\geq 2$, we obviously (for $k$ large enough) may colour the edges of $G$ so that adjacent vertices are distinguished by their pallets of colours. Suppose then that our coloured graph is examined by a person who is unable to name colours, but perceives if two object placed next to each other are coloured differently. Can we colour $G$ so that this individual can distinguish colour pallets of adjacent vertices? It is proved that if $\delta(G)$ is large enough, then it is possible using just colours 1, 2 and 3. This result is sharp and improves all earlier ones. It also constitutes a strengthening of a result by Addario-Berry, Aldred, Dalal and Reed (2005).

Highlights

  • Given vertex v ∈ V, we denote by d(v) the degree of v, and by N (v) the neighbourhood of v in G

  • A not necessarily proper edge colouring c : E → {1, 2, . . . , k} is called neighbour distinguishing if for every edge uv ∈ E, the multiset of colours incident with u is distinct from the multiset of colours incident with v

  • The problem of finding minimum k so that every graph without a K2 component admits a neighbour distinguishing edge colouring with k colours first arose

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The problem of finding minimum k so that every graph without a K2 component admits a neighbour distinguishing edge colouring with k colours first arose This was greatly improved by Addario-Berry et al [1], who showed that four colours are sufficient and provided the following refinement for graphs of sufficiently large minimum degree.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call