Abstract
In the article on colorectal cancer screening adherence in a general population in the April 2004 issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention (1), it was discovered that programming errors were made during the reweighting processes. Although this led to minor errors in the point estimates of screening rates, it did lead to substantially incorrect estimates of the 95% confidence intervals, which were inappropriately small in span and mislocated. Table 1 shows the original and corrected estimates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
