Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA. Although early detection through screening has been shown to be effective in preventing colorectal cancer mortality, adherence to screening guidelines remains low. Among certain populations--namely those with lower socioeconomic status, a greater number of chronic conditions or multiple morbidity, and those living in rural locations-- colorectal cancer screening is particularly underused. This study explored the prevalence of such screening and explanations for how multiple chronic conditions might affect colorectal cancer screening among an especially vulnerable group of middle-aged and older adults. In total, 41 participants were recruited aged 50-76 years with two or more chronic conditions, from three rural health clinics in Appalachian Kentucky, USA. Using semi-structured and structured questions and instruments, participants engaged in two interviews. Study results demonstrate colorectal cancer screening rates lower than state and national averages. In addition to commonly expressed barriers including unpleasant screening modality, lack of health insurance, and shortage of gastroenterologists to perform colonoscopy, participants described the ways in which multiple morbidities undermine screening. Barriers specific to multiple morbidity include competing demands from other conditions, such as financial pressures, physical limitations, and worries over regimen interference. The window of opportunity left open by more frequent visits to health care professionals should be used to patients' advantage, especially as people with multiple morbidity are living longer with their chronic conditions. Efforts must accelerate to establish clinical guidelines and practices incorporating both management of existing conditions and the prevention of additional future morbidity.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA

  • The Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities for the average-risk population fall into two categories: (i) those used to detect adenomatous polyps and cancer; and (ii) those used primarily to detect cancer

  • The data for this study came from the first phase of a threepart study conducted from May 2008 to April 2010, which was designed to address whether and how the increasingly common phenomenon of multiple morbidity (MM) affects the receipt of cancer screenings in a health disparity population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA. early detection through screening has been shown to be effective in preventing colorectal cancer mortality, adherence to screening guidelines remains low. Methods: In total, 41 participants were recruited aged 50–76 years with two or more chronic conditions, from three rural health clinics in Appalachian Kentucky, USA. In addition to commonly expressed barriers including unpleasant screening modality, lack of health insurance, and shortage of gastroenterologists to perform colonoscopy, participants described the ways in which multiple morbidities undermine screening. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in both men and women in the USA1. It is one of the few cancers that can be prevented through screening, and if detected at an early, localized stage, the relative five-year survival is 91%1. In Kentucky, CRC is the second leading cause of cancer death, with CRC mortality in Appalachian Kentucky 11% higher than national average[3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.