Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) virtual non-calcium (VNCa) reconstructions for the depiction of traumatic knee bone marrow edema. Fifty-seven patients (mean age, 50years; range, 20-82years) with acute knee trauma further divided into 30 women and 27 men, who had undergone third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT and 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 7days between January 2017 and May 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Six radiologists, blinded to clinical and MRI information, independently analyzed conventional grayscale dual-energy CT series for fractures; after 8weeks, readers evaluated color-coded VNCa reconstructions for the presence of bone marrow edema in six femoral and six tibial regions. Quantitative analysis of CT numbers on VNCa reconstructions was performed by a seventh radiologist. Two additional radiologists, blinded to clinical and CT information, analyzed MRI series in consensus to define the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were the primary metrics of diagnostic accuracy. MRI revealed 197 areas with bone marrow edema (91/342 femoral, 106/342 tibial). In the qualitative analysis, VNCa showed high overall sensitivity (1108/1182 [94%]) and specificity (2789/2922 [95%]) for depicting bone marrow edema. The AUC was 0.96 (femur) and 0.97 (tibia). A cutoff value of - 51 Hounsfield units (HU) provided high sensitivity (102/106 [96%]) and specificity (229/236 [97%]) for differentiating tibial bone marrow edema. In both quantitative and qualitative analyses, dual-energy CT VNCa reconstructions yielded excellent diagnostic accuracy for depicting traumatic knee bone marrow edema compared with MRI. • Dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual non-calcium (VNCa) reconstructions are highly accurate in depicting bone marrow edema of the femur and tibia. • Diagnostic confidence, image noise, and image quality were rated as equivalent in VNCa reconstructions and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) series. • VNCa images may serve as an alternative imaging approach to MRI.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
