Abstract
Purpose To investigate color vision in epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy and to evaluate the association between vigabatrin-induced visual field defects and dyschromatopsia. Design Nonrandomized comparative trial. Participants Thirty-two epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy, 18 patients treated with carbamazepine monotherapy, and 47 age-matched healthy controls were examined. Main outcome measures Color vision was examined with Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates 2 (SPP2) screening test, Farnsworth-Munsell 100 (FM 100) hue test, and Color Vision Meter 712 anomaloscope. Results Abnormal color perception was found in 32% of the epilepsy patients treated with vigabatrin monotherapy and 28% of the epilepsy patients treated with carbamazepine monotherapy. The total error score in the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test was abnormally high in the vigabatrin monotherapy patients who had concentrically constricted visual fields and a statistically significant correlation was found between the temporal visual field extents and the age-adjusted Farnsworth-Munsell 100 total error score in vigabatrin monotherapy patients ( R = .533, P = 0.003 in the right eye, R = .563, P = 0.001 in the left eye). Four of 31 (12%) vigabatrin monotherapy patients, and 1 of 18 (6%) carbamazepine monotherapy patients had a blue axis in Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test. In the anomaloscope, there were a few pathologic findings in both groups. In the SPP2 screening test, a few plates were not seen in both groups. Conclusions Both examined antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin and carbamazepine, cause acquired color vision defects. The abnormal color perception seems to be associated with constricted visual fields in the vigabatrin monotherapy patients. The duration of carbamazepine therapy correlates with high FM100 total error score. The best method for detecting dyschromatopsia in patients treated with vigabatrin or carbamazepine was the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test. The SPP2 screening test does not seem to be useful in clinical practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.