Abstract

We investigated how annual reproductive success, as measured by the number of nestlings surviving to day 10 and the percentage of nests that were successful, varied with colony size of the Cave Swallow Petrochelidon fulva in south central Texas. We also studied whether Cave Swallows chose colonies, in part, on the basis of reproductive success at a site the previous year. Neither measure of reproductive success varied significantly with colony size for either first‐wave or second‐wave nestings. Mean clutch size per colony did not vary significantly with colony size. Mean nestling body mass, an index of parental foraging efficiency, was unrelated to colony size, except for broods of five, in which nestling mass declined significantly with colony size. Colony size was not significantly affected by reproductive success at the site the previous year, although sites with more successful nests during the first wave declined less in size during the second wave within the same season than did sites that had fewer successful first‐wave nests. Unlike the closely related Cliff Swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota, Cave Swallows did not use breeding performance of conspecifics in choosing nest‐sites, because they did not preferentially aggregate at sites that were the most successful the previous year. Coloniality in Cave Swallows did not appear to have a net negative effect on annual fitness, suggesting that colonial nesting was not solely a response to nest‐site limitation, but the benefits of breeding colonially (if any) were unclear.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call