Abstract
Colonoscopy is believed to be more complicated in elderly patients in Western countries. It is uncertain if the situation holds true among Asians. This study is to determine differences in colonoscopy performance and sedation complications between patients aged<65 years and those>or=65 years of age in an Asian population. A prospective, cross-sectional study of adults attending outpatient colonoscopy at a tertiary institution. Clinical and endoscopic data were obtained from all consenting adults. Two hundred and one patients (70 elderly and 131 aged<65 years) were enrolled. Compared to the patients aged<65 years, the elderly patients had similar levels of good (42.9%vs 45.8%), satisfactory (42.9%vs 33.6%) and poor (14.3%vs 20.6%) bowel preparations (P=NS). Cecal intubation was achieved in 60 (85.7%) of the elderly patients and 116 (88.5%) of the younger adults (P=NS). The differences in mean total colonoscopy duration was not significant (30+/-13 vs 27+/-11 min). Although the elderly patients received lower mean sedation doses of midazolam (4.7 vs 5.1 mg) and pethidine (37.8 vs 46.4 mg) compared to the younger adults, the hypotension rates were significantly higher in the elderly patients (7.1%vs 0.8%, P=0.01). The elderly patients had in additional one or more co-morbid illnesses (P=0.001), with significantly higher rates of diabetes (P=0.004), ischemic heart disease (P=0.03), hypertension (P=0.001) and stroke disease (P=0.004). Colonoscopy performance in elderly Asians is similar to that in younger adults. However, the conscious sedation of these patients results in a higher rate of cardio-vascular complications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.