Abstract
Since 2012, a colonization screening (CoS) for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRGN) in very low birth weight infants (VLWBI) was implemented in order to provide a basis for an effective empiric therapy of subsequent nosocomial infections (NI). According to antibiotic stewardship, carbapenems should be reserved for NI caused by MRGN or severe NI. We examined whether the CoS increased the first-line use of carbapenems. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we enrolled all VLBWI before (2009–2011) and after (2012–2014) the introduction of CoS (2012) at a tertiary university neonatal intensive care and neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMC) in Germany. Rectal swabs were used to detect MRGN colonization (on admission and weekly until discharge from the NIMC). The use of carbapenems was measured by days of therapy (DoT). To exclude the replacement of carbapenems by other antibiotics, antibiotic therapy for late-onset sepsis (LOS) was assessed by DoT and length of therapy (LoT). In 55/201 (27.4%) VLBWI, CoS detected MRGN colonization. Compared to the cohort prior to the introduction of CoS (n = 191), a significant decrease in LoT (p < 0.001) and total DoT (p < 0.001) was seen (n = 201). This was due to a significant decrease in LoT (p < 0.001) and total DoT (p < 0.001) in the birth weight category of 1,000–1,499 g. In these infants, DoT for carbapenems (p = 0.009) was significantly lower, possibly caused by a significant decline of LOS (25 episodes vs. 39 episodes, p = 0.025). Conversely, no significant differences in LoT and total DoT were seen in infants with a birth weight <500 g (p = 1.000; p = 0.758) and in infants weighing 500–999 g (p = 0.754; p = 0.794). DoT for carbapenems was not significantly different in the total cohort after the introduction of CoS (p = 0.341). Prolonged exposure to carbapenems (in terms of DoT) significantly postponed the first detection of MRGN colonization (p = 0.023). The introduction of CoS did not result in an increased use of carbapenems. Concomitant carbapenem treatment may reduce the sensitivity of CoS relying on rectal swabs.
Highlights
Very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) have an increased risk for late onset sepsis (LOS) [1]
All neonates with a birth weight less than 1.500 g (VLWBI), small for gestational age, and with intrauterine growth restriction admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for 3 years prior to the introduction of colonization screening (CoS) (2009– 2011) were compared to those VLBWI admitted in the 3 years after its introduction (2012–2014)
Since early and unspecific symptoms may rapidly progress to severe sepsis and septic shock with multi-organ failure, timely empiric antibiotic treatment is of utmost importance when late-onset sepsis (LOS) is suspected [1]
Summary
Very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) have an increased risk for late onset sepsis (LOS) [1]. Today the overall mortality of VLBWI is around 6–11%, with nosocomial infections (NI), e.g., LOS and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), being significant contributors [3]. The attributable mortality of LOS is 9–15%, depending on clinical severity and causative pathogens [3]. Nosocomial infections increase the costs during hospitalization and after discharge [5]. Prevention of NI aims at reducing mortality, short- and long-term morbidity, and healthcare expenditures [5, 6]. Since the early signs and symptoms of LOS are often non-specific and LOS may progress to shock with multiorgan failure without timely and appropriate treatment, empiric antibiotic treatment is started at a low threshold in VLBWI with suspected LOS [1, 7, 8]. VLWBI are mostly born by Cesarean section and subsequently colonized with bacterial pathogens from the surrounding neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment; colonization patterns differ between NICUs [2]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.