Abstract

Introduction.Colon and rectal cancer (CC, RC) are different entities from a clinical and tumor biological point of view. Up to now, both, CC and RC, are synonymously called “Colorectal Cancer” (CRC). With our experience in basic and clinical research and routine work in this field we now have come to the opinion, that the term “CRC” should definitely be questioned, and if justified, be abandoned.Materials/Methods.We analyzed the actual available data from the literature and our own results from the Ulm based study group FOGT to proof or reject our hypothesis.Results.The following evident differences were recognized: Anatomically, the risk to develop RC is 4× higher than for CC. Molecular changes in carcinogenesis in CC are different from RC. Physical activity helps to prevent CC, not RC. Pathologically there are differences between RC and CC. In addition, there are also major clinical differences between CC and RC, such as in surgical topography and– procedures, multimodal treatment (MMT) approaches (RC in MMT is less sensitive to chemotherapy than CC), and prognostic factors for the spontaneous course and for success of MMT (e.g. TS or DPD ). Discussion. CC ´sand RC´s definitely are different in parameters of causal and formal carcinogenesis, effectivity of primary prevention by physical activity, conventional and molecular pathology.According to our findings we can demand from the preclinical point of view that CC and RC are two different tumor entities in terms of various representative biological characteristics.CC and RC are also differing substantially in many clinical features, as outlined in a separate paper from our group.Conclusion.“CRC” should no longer be used in basic and clinical research and other fields of cancer classification as a single disease entity. CC is not the same as RC. CC might even be divided into right and left CC.

Highlights

  • Colon and rectal cancer (CC, rectal cancer” (RC)) are different entities from a clinical and tumor biological point of view

  • We have been involved in national projects to structure and improve treatment of colon- and rectal cancer patients (Interdisciplinary Ulm-based “Forschungsgruppe Oncologie Gastrointestinale Tumoren” (FOGT); German Cancer Society (DKG) -S3 Guide lines, DKG structural commision for DKG Large Bowel Centers, Surgical Group for Visceral Oncology (CAO-V)) and organized in part nationwide activities/projects for disease prevention for the Hessian and German Cancer Societies (HKG, DKG): (“1000 Mutige Männer”, and “du bist kostbar”(nationwide DKG-projects for cancer prevention and living with cancer)

  • In our literature analysis looking at various factors relevant for CC and RC on the molecular and protein level, many of them included in the CRC Subtyping Consortium (CRCSC)-analysis, we found out, that the proximal colon and the distal colon+rectum show evident differences in expression (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colon and rectal cancer (CC, RC) are different entities from a clinical and tumor biological point of view. Colon- and rectal cancer (CC and RC) up to now are regarded as a single tumor entity, “Colorectal Cancer”/CRC, in all fields of basic- and clinical research as well as in clinical practice. This is based on the assumption that CC and RC develop in the large bowel, thought to be a similar organ from the ileocecal valve up to the dentate line as boundaries to the small bowel on the oral edge and to the anal canal, sphincter ani, and skin, aborally. We analyzed the СИБИРСКИЙ ОНКОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ. 2018; 17(4): 88–98

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call