Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper introduces a model combining “shading” from behavioral contract theory and collusion in hierarchical organizations to analyze optimal auditing strategies. It investigates whether internal, external, or both auditors should be used to mitigate collusion and shading, contributing to both analytical auditing and collusion literature. The model emphasizes the trade-offs in supervision accuracy, collusion easiness, fixed costs, and shading pressure between internal and external auditors. This work enriches understanding of resource allocation and decision processes in hierarchical organizations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.