Abstract
Research indicates that a criminal history significantly reduces a prospective student’s chance of being accepted into a higher education institution, yet little evidence addresses how universities make these decisions. Given the number of people with the mark of a criminal record and the collateral consequences that it carries, this analysis describes decision-making on criminal and disciplinary records. It utilizes a relational theory of risk to understand the social construction of risk in the context where universities hold stated goals of public safety and equitable access to education. Through interviews with seventeen university admissions administrators, we find that arbitrariness in the evaluation of “red flag” students remains although this university system has established formal requirements around background information. Along with formal requirements, decision-makers rely on their own subjective perceptions and experiences to evaluate risk among applicants. Findings contribute to our understanding of the construction of risk in organizations and policy around assessing criminal records in higher education.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
