Abstract
This article analyzes the practice of collecting evidence as a result of criminal provocation, legislation of foreign countries on the regulation of this issue and the opinions of scientists, the socially dangerous consequences of criminal provocation, the legal gaps in the current national legal documents, and the problems in practice. In particular, the practice of creating artificial evidence as a result of criminal provocation and accusing a person based on it has been seriously criticized by the European Court of Human Rights and the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD). The exact boundaries that distinguish criminal provocation from search activity have not been studied. On the basis of the above analysis, proposals are made to prevent cases of criminal provocation for collecting artificial evidence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
