Collection and transportation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus diagnostic samples: Optimizing the usage of guanidine-based chaotropic salts for enhanced biosafety and viral genome preservation

Abstract

Many virus lysis/transport buffers used in molecular diagnostics, including the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA, contain guanidine-based chaotropic salts, primarily guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) or guanidine isothiocyanate (GITC). Although the virucidal effects of GuHCl and GITC alone against some enveloped viruses have been established, standardized data on their optimum virucidal concentrations against SARS-CoV-2 and effects on viral RNA stability are scarce. Thus, we aimed to determine the optimum virucidal concentrations of GuHCl and GITC against SARS-CoV-2 compared to influenza A virus (IAV), another enveloped respiratory virus. We also evaluated the effectiveness of viral RNA stabilization at the determined optimum virucidal concentrations under high-temperature conditions (35°C) using virus-specific real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Both viruses were potently inactivated by 1.0 M GITC and 2.5 M GuHCl, but the GuHCl concentration for efficient SARS-CoV-2 inactivation was slightly higher than that for IAV inactivation. GITC showed better viral RNA stability than GuHCl at the optimum virucidal concentrations. An increased concentration of GuHCl or GITC increased viral RNA degradation at 35°C. Our findings highlight the need to standardize GuHCl and GITC concentrations in virus lysis/transport buffers and the potential application of these guanidine-based salts alone as virus inactivation solutions in SARS-CoV-2 and IAV molecular diagnostics.