Abstract

There is increasing academic and pragmatic interest in leveraging patent rights to invigorate remanufacturing for waste products under governmental interventions via regulations and reward–penalty instruments. In practice, many original manufacturers that are possessed with intellectual property rights allow third-party remanufacturers to implement reproducing operations through authorization and charging licensing fees. The general purpose of this paper is to explore favorable strategies for a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) system of waste product collection and remanufacturing, in the context of either manufacturer-remanufacturing or remanufacturer-remanufacturing. To achieve such an objective, game theory is adopted to establish models of three collection and remanufacturing modes among channel members involving a manufacturer, a seller, and a remanufacturer. In so doing, the results show that a government’s allocations of elementary remanufacturing ratio and the unit amount of reward–penalty count significantly in CLSC operations, especially for the manufacturer, who acts as the leader in the system and makes mode selections.

Highlights

  • Aggravated resource depletion and environmental deterioration have attracted widespread concern in the international community

  • The extended producer responsibility (EPR) instrument introduced by the European Union (EU) and the waste treatment mechanism deployed by Japan are popular paradigms of such applicable regulations

  • The 13th Five-Year Plan proposed by National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) in China further highlights the aforementioned initiatives, which fulfills governmental assignments in establishing a well-run mechanism, reinforcing EOL product recovery, and remanufacturing implementations: all of these justify that the government is expecting to vitalize energy-conservative and environment-friendly industries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aggravated resource depletion and environmental deterioration have attracted widespread concern in the international community. The Regulation on [the] Management of E-waste Disposal promulgated in January 2011 is one of the most influential take-back directives based on the EPR principles It aims to alleviate environmental pollution and resource shortage by enhancing manufacturers’ liabilities, holding them financially responsible for the treatment of their products after the end-of-life (EOL). The impact of governmental legislations on CLSC implementations are clarified in order to investigate the strategy selections of channel members and provide favorable recommendations, especially for the manufacturer. Such studies are virtually imperative for the formulation and enforcement of a well-run collection and remanufacturing system, as it will provide significant references for improving CLSC benefits and promoting sustainable development

Literature Review
Problem Descriptions
Comparisons of MM Model and SM Model
Remanufacturer-Remanufacturing Mode with Authorization
Conclusions
Policy and Managerial Implications
Limitations and Future Research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call