Abstract

Many systems rely on the expertise from human operators, who have acquired their knowledge through practical experience over the course of many years. For the detection of anomalies in industrial settings, sensor units have been introduced to predict and classify such anomalous events, but these critically rely on annotated data for training. Lengthy data collection campaigns are needed, which tend to be combined with domain expert annotations of the data afterwards, resulting in costly and slow process. This work presents an alternative by studying live annotation of rare anomalous events in sensor streams in a real-world manufacturing setting by experienced human operators that can also observe the machinery itself. A prototype for visualization and in situ annotation of sensor signals is developed with embedded unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms to propose signals for annotation and which allows the operators to give feedback on the detection and classify anomalous events. This prototype allowed assembling a corpus of several weeks of sensor data measured in a real manufacturing surrounding and was annotated by domain experts as an evaluation basis for this study. The evaluation of live annotations reveals high user motivation after getting accustomed to the labeling prototype. After this initial period, clear anomalies with characteristic signal patterns are detected reliably in visualized envelope signals. More subtle signal deviations were less likely to be confirmed an anomaly due to either an insufficient visibility in envelope signals or the absence of characteristic signal patterns.

Highlights

  • Collecting labels for rare anomalous events is notoriously difficult

  • nearest centroid (NC) models combined with Euclidean distance (ED) measures (NC (ED)) performed especially well when signals were aligned to the normal centroid via cross correlation before computation of the ED measure (NC (ED+TI))

  • We suggested an alternative approach to retrospective annotation of sensor streams in industrial scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collecting labels for rare anomalous events is notoriously difficult. Often, frequent spurious signal outliers dominate seemingly detected anomalies and shadow the few, real anomalies. Depending on the chosen anomaly detection algorithm, this dominance of spurious outliers typically results in either a high false positive rate (FPR) or false negative rate (FNR). This is even more the case for purely unsupervised models. In the chosen machine tool monitoring application, spurious outliers are given by frequent process adaptations while real anomalies are typically rare. The reason for the latter is that machines in a real-world production surrounding are typically used for processing the same type of workpiece over a long period of time, spanning several months to years. Robust process parameter settings are known due to the well-understood machine behavior for this exact workpiece type, which in turn results in anomalies appearing only rarely

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.