Abstract

The ongoing search for the perfect graft to fill out facial contour defects has frustrated reconstructive surgeons for years. The list of autogenous, homologous, heterologous, and alloplastic materials is extensive. All implantable materials have one or more classical principal drawbacks: shrinkage, extrusion, infection, absorption, and/or deformation. One of the major mechanisms of graft unacceptability is the phenomenon of tissue immunity and graft rejection. This has traditionally been the major disadvantage of homografts and heterografts. The host's immune system recognizes the implant as "non-self," an antibody-antigen reaction is triggered--usually by the antigenic stimulation provided by the proteinaceous component of the graft, and the implant is rejected or destroyed. Conversely, autogenous grafts experience the problem of resorption by the action of macrophages and chronic inflammatory cells. The immunologic sterility of alloplastic grafts is an advantage, but the body often rejects even the most inert materials by the process of chronic inflammation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.