Abstract

Abstract A turbidimetric microbiological assay method for monensin in chicken rations was submitted in a modified form to 8 collaborating laboratories along with randomized and coded samples. Three laboratories used the manual method and 5 used the automated method. Other factors in the experimental design were ration types (broiler starter, broiler finisher, and pullet grower), feed form (meal vs. pellets), and potency level (90 and 110 g/ton) for one ration. Average recoveries for the ration types over all laboratories and feed forms were 87.7—93.13% of label, while mean recoveries in 2 feed forms were 91.7% for meal and 87.6% for pellets. Average recoveries in the 8 laboratories ranged from 84.6 to 106.64% of label for 90 g/ton rations and 87.1 to 106.6% for 110 g/ton rations. There was no significant difference between the manual and the automated methods. The collaborators’ assays were uniform with respect to within-laboratory variation. Relative standard deviations ranged from 4.51 to 10.76% with a median of 6.04%. Agreement with the plate assay is quite good. The turbidimetric method for monensin has been adopted as official first action.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.