Abstract

Collaborative actions between citizens and government agencies at the local level have the potential to raise community resilience to climate risks via social learning and increased social capital. However, for these actions to succeed, community members’ values, norms and risk perceptions must support collaborative action and be accompanied by self-efficacy. This paper develops a theoretical framework linking these concepts and applies the framework to a collaborative climate risk project in Singapore, using qualitative data from focus group discussions. We find that pro-social values are a strong enabling factor for residents to engage in collaboration, but that perceptions of low collective efficacy are a potential barrier. In particular, we find that the relative competence of the government leads to a perception of “exemptionalism,” which undermines individuals’ intentions to devote resources to collaborative action.

Highlights

  • Global climate change is expected to generate and exacerbate risks such as flash flooding, heat waves and storm surges at the local level

  • In order to understand the range of attitudes, beliefs and intentions of community members and their links to individuals’ willingness to engage in collaborative climate risk interventions, we employed a focus group discussion method that was guided by grounded theory approaches to data collection and analysis

  • The focus group discussion (FGD) revealed the presence of enabling factors favouring collaborative actions to manage local climate risks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global climate change is expected to generate and exacerbate risks such as flash flooding, heat waves and storm surges at the local level. Collaborations open up opportunities for residents to create bonds with one another and with government agencies, contributing to social capital, which helps individuals and groups to resist shocks and recover more quickly and completely from disasters [5]. These attributes of collaborative action to address local climate risks are recognised by stakeholders, and a growing number of government agencies across geographies are exploring projects of this kind

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.