Abstract

AbstractAimAssessing the distribution and persistence of species across their range is a crucial component of wildlife conservation. It demands data at adequate spatial scales and over extended periods of time, which may only be obtained through collaborative efforts, and the development of methods that integrate heterogeneous datasets. We aimed to combine existing data on large carnivores to evaluate population dynamics and improve knowledge on their distribution nationwide.LocationBotswana.MethodsBetween 2010 and 2016, we collated data on African wild dog, cheetah, leopard, brown and spotted hyaena and lion gathered with different survey methods by independent researchers across Botswana. We used a multi‐species, multi‐method dynamic occupancy model to analyse factors influencing occupancy, persistence and colonization, while accounting for imperfect detection. Lastly, we used the gained knowledge to predict the probability of occurrence of each species countrywide.ResultsWildlife areas and communal rangelands had similar occupancy probabilities for most species. Large carnivore occupancy was low in commercial farming areas and where livestock density was high, except for brown hyaena. Lion occupancy was negatively associated with human density; lion and spotted hyaena occupancy was high where rainfall was high, while the opposite applied to brown hyaena. Lion and leopard occupancy remained constant countrywide over the study period. African wild dog and cheetah occupancy declined over time in the south and north, respectively, whereas both hyaena species expanded their ranges. Countrywide predictions identified the highest occupancy for leopards and lowest for the two hyaena species.Main ConclusionsWe highlight the necessity of data sharing and propose a generalizable analytical method that addresses the challenges of heterogeneous data common in ecology. Our approach, which enables a comprehensive multi‐species assessment at large spatial and temporal scales, supports the development of data‐driven conservation guidelines and the implementation of evidence‐based management strategies nationally and internationally.

Highlights

  • Monitoring wildlife distributions and population persistence are essential for determining causes of decline and developing strategies to counteract such declines

  • We considered four methods of data collection: camera trapping, spoor surveys along transects, telemetry data from very high frequency (VHF) and global positioning system collars (GPS) collars, and opportunistic sightings

  • We combined seasonal rainfall data into a single layer that represented the average rainfall over the entire study period. This represents long-­term climatic conditions that we assumed affects the large-­scale distribution of all species and allowed us to assess the broader impact of above-­ground water availability on carnivore occupancy along the north to south rainfall gradient that characterizes Botswana

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Monitoring wildlife distributions and population persistence are essential for determining causes of decline and developing strategies to counteract such declines. Where data are sparse in space and time, and heterogeneous in structure, there remains a need to incorporate these aspects into a single analytical framework This creates opportunities to harness existing datasets from a variety of sources that could be used to improve species management by assessing the impact of various environmental and anthropogenic factors on species distributions and dynamics at large spatial scales and over extended periods of time. While the larger, conspicuous lion (Panthera leo) and spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) are often confined to protected areas (Bauer et al, 2015; Mills & Hofer, 2013), the smaller and more mobile cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), African wild dog (Lycaon pictus), leopard (P. pardus) and brown hyaena (Parahyaena brunnea) demonstrate an ability to occupy agro-­pastoral regions (Boast & Houser, 2012; Lindsey et al, 2004) These regions vary in both human and livestock densities, influencing the presence of large carnivores through variations in persecution risk, prey populations and water availability. We aimed to use our model to predict the probability of occurrence of each species countrywide, covering areas that lack empirical data

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call