Colecistectomía laparoscópica frente a colecistectomía convencional por minilaparotomía

Abstract

To describe differences in operating time, pain scores, analgesic consumption, complications, length of hospital stay, and quality of life in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy (MLC).Between 1991 and July 1999, we performed a study of 1041 patients with gallstones who underwent LC (group A, n = 421 patients) or MLC (group B, n = 620 patients). Age, sex, ASA score, pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic and antiemetic consumption, operating time, complications and length of hospital stay were recorded. Nottingham Health Profile questionnaires were completed by a subgroup of 200 patients, and respiratory response was evaluated using a Fokuda spirometer before surgery and at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were evaluated. The results were interpreted using the SPSS program and descriptive statistics were performed with p = 0.05.The mean age was 48.9 +/- 14.2 years; 80.5% of the patients were women; 87.88% of the patients were ASA I. Elective surgery was performed in 89.78%. The mean operating time was 94 +/- 45 minutes in LC and was 108 +/- 48 minutes in MLC (p < 0.001). LC was associated with lower postoperative pain (0 = 68.88%), lower analgesic-antiemetic requirements (0 = 9.03%) and shorter length of hospital stay. Complications were significantly more frequent in group B (p = 0.05); two patients in group B died within 30 days of surgery (0.32%).LC appears to be associated with lower pain scores and analgesic-antiemetic requirements and shorter recovery times than MLC. The results in terms of quality of life in LC were excellent.