Abstract

Biological, physical and chemical interaction between one (or more) microorganisms and a host organism, causing host cell damage, represents an infection. Infection of a plant, animal or microorganism with a virus can prevent infection with another virus. This phenomenon is known as viral interference. Viral interference is shown to result from two types of interactions, one taking place at the cell surface and the other intracellularly. Various viruses use different receptors to enter the same host cell, but various strains of one virus use the same receptor. The rate of virus–receptor binding can vary between different viruses attacking the same host, allowing interference or coinfection. The outcome of the virus–virus–host competition is determined by the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses and host. The virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of binding to the host cell receptor will enter the host first, while the virus characterized by a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will overtake the host metabolic machine and dominate. Once in the host cell, the multiplication machinery is shared by the competing viruses. Their potential to utilize it depends on the Gibbs energy of growth. Thus, the virus with a more negative Gibbs energy of growth will dominate. Therefore, the outcome can be interference or coinfection, depending on both the attachment kinetics (susceptibility) and the intracellular multiplication machinery (permittivity). The ratios of the Gibbs energies of binding and growth of the competing viruses determine the outcome of the competition. Based on this, a predictive model of virus–virus competition is proposed.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMany are wondering whether this is a result of intense vaccination against influenza, the application of epidemiological measures, such as masks and social distancing, or interference [2]

  • This paper considers the potential biothermodynamic mechanism as the cause of interference

  • At the molecular level, pathogen–host and pathogen–pathogen–host interactions represent a chemical phenomenon that can be explained with a biothermodynamic mechanism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many are wondering whether this is a result of intense vaccination against influenza, the application of epidemiological measures, such as masks and social distancing, or interference [2]. Viral interference is a phenomenon where a virus can prevent or partially inhibit infection with another virus within the same host [4,5,6], implying infection by two viruses consecutively. It is important to underline that simultaneous infection with two viruses can result in interference or coinfection. Interference is an important phenomenon that influences the dynamics of spreading of viruses that co-circulate in a population. It was observed that an epidemic caused by one virus can be suppressed by a co-circulating virus [3,7]. It would be beneficial to have a model that would allow us to better understand and predict the outcome of viral interaction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call