Abstract

Background Community engagement is an increasingly important requirement of public health research and plays an important role in the informed consent and recruitment process. However, there is very little guidance about how it should be done, the indicators for assessing effectiveness of the community engagement process and the impact it has on recruitment, retention, and ultimately on the quality of the data collected as part of longitudinal cohort studies. Methods An instrumental case study approach, with data from field notes, policy documents, unstructured interviews, and focus group discussions with key community stakeholders and informants, was used to explore systematically the implementation and outcomes of the community engagement strategy for recruitment of an entire community into a demographic and health surveillance site in Malaysia. Results For a dynamic cohort, community engagement needs to be an ongoing process. The community engagement process has likely helped to facilitate the current response rate of 85% in the research communities. The case study highlights the importance of systematic documentation of the community engagement process to ensure an understanding of the effects of the research on recruitment and the community. Conclusions A critical lesson from the case study data is the importance of relationships in the recruitment process for large population-based studies, and the need for ongoing documentation and analysis of the impact of cumulative interactions between research and community engagement.

Highlights

  • Community engagement is an increasingly important requirement of public health research and plays an important role in the informed consent and recruitment process

  • We provide a detailed description and analysis of the community engagement strategy for recruitment of the population for the South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) Health and demographic surveillance systems (HDSS) and discuss the broader implications of community engagement for the quality of the research and for the recruitment and maintenance of cohorts

  • Data collection was preceded by a flyer drop where information sheets about SEACO and the census round were distributed to each household within a week of when the data collector was intending to visit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Community engagement is an increasingly important requirement of public health research and plays an important role in the informed consent and recruitment process. There is very little guidance about how it should be done, the indicators for assessing effectiveness of the community engagement process and the impact it has on recruitment, retention, and on the quality of the data collected as part of longitudinal cohort studies. The case study highlights the importance of systematic documentation of the community engagement process to ensure an understanding of the effects of the research on recruitment and the community. Conclusions: A critical lesson from the case study data is the importance of relationships in the recruitment process for large population-based studies, and the need for ongoing documentation and analysis of the impact of cumulative interactions between research and community engagement

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call