Abstract
One important question with which the Coh-Metrix team has grappled is how to measure text difficulty, complexity, or, in turn, its ease . This chapter describes the two traditional readability measures provided by Coh-Metrix – Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (RDFKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (RDFRE) – as well as the readability index that we developed for second-language texts (RDL2). We also describe the Coh-Metrix Text Easability Principal Component Scores that are provided in Coh-Metrix 3.0 (i.e., PCNAR, PCSYN, PCCNC, PCREF, PCDC, PCVERB, PCONN, PCTEMP). The traditional and more common approach to scaling texts is to have a single metric of text ease or difficulty. This is the approach taken by popular metrics such as Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (Kincaid, Fishburne, Rogers, & Chissom, 1975) and Flesch Reading Ease (Flesch, 1948; Klare, 1974–1975), which are provided by the Coh-Metrix tool. These two Flesch–Kincaid metrics are based on the length of words and sentences within the text. In Coh-Metrix, the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (RDFKGL) is computed as [(0.39 * sentence length) + (11.8 * word length) – 15.59]. The Flesch Reading Ease (RDFRE) is computed as [206.835 – (1.015 * sentence length) – (84.6 * word length)]. Sentence length (DESSL) is measured by the mean number of words per sentence in a text, whereas word length (DESWLsy) is measured as the mean number of syllables per word (which is highly correlated with the mean number of letters).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.