Abstract
This article is based on the area of Interactional Sociolinguistics and presents an analysis of excerpts from the argumentative text published by José Pacheco Pereira “O vírus que atacou a língua portuguesa”. Fragments of the text were analyzed to interpret cohesion and coherence and the justification of its arguments in the reading of this article is presented. In this initiative, the results revealed the pragmatic interpretation that the text had with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Highlights
We chose the argumentative text published by José Pacheco Pereira entitled “O vírus que atacou a língua portuguesa”, because it is welcomed in the theme of the Interactional Sociolinguistics seminar
Cohesion is preserved in texts based on various procedures that can be lexical if they take into account the words and their meanings, the grammatical aspects and the various resources that are used
The author has a trajectory of interaction with a community that supports or does not support the elimination of the Orthographic Agreement of 1990
Summary
We chose the argumentative text published by José Pacheco Pereira entitled “O vírus que atacou a língua portuguesa”, because it is welcomed in the theme of the Interactional Sociolinguistics seminar. He’s always been at odds with the AO90 In his article, he refers to the Agreement as “acordês”, which can generate a situation of confusion. He refers to the Agreement as “acordês”, which can generate a situation of confusion This confusion led me to look for the definition of the word “chord”, but I found nothing relevant. The closest word was chords, without circumflex, referring to musical chords. The word presents an air of confusion and leads you to reflect on the author’s thinking: the spelling disagreement. This argumentative text was so interesting that I decided to examine it and seek its justification and coherence
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have