Abstract
The conditional-value-at-risk (C V@R) has been widely used as a risk measure. It is well known, that C V@R is coherent in the sense of Artzner, Delbaen, Eber, Heath (1999). The class of coherent risk measures is convex. It was conjectured, that all coherent risk measures can be represented as convex combinations of C V@R’s. In this note we show that this conjecture is wrong.
Highlights
Let the random variable represent the future value of a portfolio
The conditional value-at-risk Î@R is defined as follows
It was conjectured that the class Î@RÀ coincides with the class of coherent risk measures
Summary
Let the random variable represent the future value of a portfolio. To measure the risk contained in is an important task in stochastic finance. Among the enormous group of statistical parameters, which can be associated to , like expectation, median, variance, mean absolute deviation, coefficient of variation, Gini-measure etc., only some qualify as acceptable risk measures. Delbaen, Eber, Heath (1999) call a statistical parameterμ coherent, if it has the following properties: (i) First order stochastic monotonicity. È 1⁄2 Ù È 3⁄4 Ù for all Ù implies 1⁄2 μ 3⁄4 μ (ii) Positive homogeneity.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.