Abstract

The conditional-value-at-risk (C V@R) has been widely used as a risk measure. It is well known, that C V@R is coherent in the sense of Artzner, Delbaen, Eber, Heath (1999). The class of coherent risk measures is convex. It was conjectured, that all coherent risk measures can be represented as convex combinations of C V@R’s. In this note we show that this conjecture is wrong.

Highlights

  • Let the random variable represent the future value of a portfolio

  • The conditional value-at-risk Î@R is defined as follows

  • It was conjectured that the class Î@RÀ coincides with the class of coherent risk measures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Let the random variable represent the future value of a portfolio. To measure the risk contained in is an important task in stochastic finance. Among the enormous group of statistical parameters, which can be associated to , like expectation, median, variance, mean absolute deviation, coefficient of variation, Gini-measure etc., only some qualify as acceptable risk measures. Delbaen, Eber, Heath (1999) call a statistical parameterμ coherent, if it has the following properties: (i) First order stochastic monotonicity. È 1⁄2 Ù È 3⁄4 Ù for all Ù implies 1⁄2 μ 3⁄4 μ (ii) Positive homogeneity.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.