Abstract

Imaging radar is a key perception technology for automotive and industrial applications. A lot of progress has been made with high channel count systems, deploying, for example, 12 transmit and 16 receive channels with cascaded monolithic microwave integrated circuit solutions. Nevertheless, fully automated driving requires even higher angular resolution for drive-under/drive-over decisions and exact predictions of object trajectories in dense urban driving scenarios. Both problems can be solved by increasing the antenna size and building larger radars. However, there is a physical limit to what can be placed on the front of a car, and manufacturing very large arrays is quite difficult. Thus, coherent automotive radar networks are a way to achieve high spatial resolution and obtain the complete velocity vector of an object from a single measurement. This solution is commercially attractive, as the sensor can remain relatively small, and complexity can be moved from the physical hardware to algorithms and processing. Two different test setups, each comprised of two multiple-input multiple-output radar units in the 76-77 GHz band, are presented in this article. To obtain azimuth and additional elevation information, the setups use a 1D and a 2D antenna array, respectively. Processing-based coherent evaluation is employed to create an additional radar image with doubled azimuth resolution and improved signal-to-noise ratio and to enable the estimation of vectorial target velocities. These benefits are presented and compared with optical reference images in traffic scenarios.

Highlights

  • Compared to monostatic radar with a colocated transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX), bistatic or multisite radar systems (MSRSs) provide numerous advantages but with more stringent requirements for cooperative networks [1]

  • BRIEF SUMMARY coherent full-duplex double-sided (CFDDS)-TWR AND SIGNAL MODEL As we have shown in [46], coherent wireless local positioning is possible with CFDDS two-way ranging (TWR) and coarsely synchronized units

  • MEASUREMENT RESULTS To evaluate the aforementioned properties of CFDDS radar, measurements were carried out using two different setups, each consisting of two multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar stations

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Compared to monostatic radar with a colocated transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX), bistatic or multisite radar systems (MSRSs) provide numerous advantages but with more stringent requirements for cooperative networks [1]. The benefits of such netted arrangements include an increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), higher positioning accuracy, velocity vector estimation, improved spatial resolution, and enhanced signal information body. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ transmitting radar to a target and back to another spatially separated receiving radar should be evaluated simultaneously and coherently.

CLASSIFICATION OF DISTRIBUTED RADAR SYSTEMS
APPLICATION TO DISTRIBUTED MIMO SYSTEMS
REQUIRED PROCESSING STEPS
SYSTEM SETUP
CALIBRATION
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.