Abstract

The Aberdeen birth cohorts of 1921 and 1936 (ABC21 and ABC36) were subjected to IQ tests in 1932 or 1947 when they were aged about 11y. They were recruited between 1997–2001 among cognitively healthy community residents and comprehensively phenotyped in a long-term study of brain aging and health up to 2017. Here, we report associations between baseline cognitive test scores and long-term cognitive outcomes. On recruitment, significant sex differences within and between the ABC21 and ABC36 cohorts supported advantages in verbal ability and learning among the ABC36 women that were not significant in ABC21. Comorbid physical disorders were self-reported in both ABC21 and ABC36 but did not contribute to differences in terms of performance in cognitive tests. When used alone without other criteria, cognitive tests scores which fell below the −1.5 SD criterion for tests of progressive matrices, namely verbal learning, digit symbol and block design, did not support the concept that Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a stable class of acquired loss of function with significant links to the later emergence of a clinical dementia syndrome. This is consistent with many previous reports. Furthermore, because childhood IQ-type data were available, we showed that a lower cognitive performance at about 64 or 78 y than that predicted by IQ at 11 ± 0.5 y did not improve the prediction of progress to MCI or greater cognitive loss. We used binary logistic regression to explore how MCI might contribute to the prediction of later progress to a clinical dementia syndrome. In a fully adjusted model using ABC21 data, we found that non-amnestic MCI, along with factors such as female sex and depressive symptoms, contributed to the prediction of later dementia. A comparable model using ABC36 data did not do so. We propose that (1) MCI criteria restricted to cognitive test scores do not improve the temporal stability of MCI classifications; (2) pathways towards dementia may differ according to age at dementia onset and (3) the concept of MCI may require measures (not captured here) that underly self-reported subjective age-related cognitive decline.

Highlights

  • The detection of early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in clinical practice should be straightforward: patients who do not have a clinical dementia syndrome but who are impaired in these cognitive domains without sufficient explanation are considered to be at high risk of progressive impairment

  • Life course experiences provide the context for our study; these differed between Aberdeen Birth Cohort sub-sample (ABC21) and Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1936 (ABC36), and these major influences are probably reflective of developments in nutrition, health care, education and employment opportunities in many developed countries during the twentieth century

  • Recent advances in the conceptualization of psychiatric disorders as disruptions of dynamic systems point towards the development of complex multi-component models quantified over substantial observation periods founded on the type of cross-sectional study frequently reported in the characterization of Mild Cognitive Impairment’ (MCI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnostic category of ‘Mild Cognitive Impairment’ (MCI) was introduced to improve the appraisal of risk in terms of a patient’s progress towards a clinical dementia syndrome. Proposals to improve the validity and reliability of MCI classification have scrutinized proposed MCI diagnostic criteria and questioned the inclusion of requirements such as subjective cognitive loss and the absence of any satisfactory alternative explanation [9,10]. These concerns emphasize the provisional nature of MCI and a need for prospective validation studies [11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.