Abstract

Acquired disorders of writing in the Russian language have been reported for more than a century. The study of these disorders reflects the history of Russian neuropsychology and is dominated by the syndrome approach most notably by the writings of Luria. Indeed, our understanding of acquired dysgraphia in Russian speakers is conceptualized according to the classical approach in Modern Russia. In this review, we describe the classical approach and compare it to the cognitive neuropsychological models of writing disorders that are developed to explain dysgraphia in English and in other Western European languages. We argue that the basic theoretical assumptions of the two approaches – cognitive and classical or syndrome approach – share similarities. It is therefore proposed that identification of acquired cases of dysgraphia in Russian could potentially benefit from taking the cognitive neuropsychological perspective. We also conclude that adopting elements of the syndrome approach would substantially enrich the understanding of acquired dysgraphia since these offer an insight into processes not described in the cognitive neuropsychological approach.

Highlights

  • The theory of dynamic and systematic localization of higher mental functions proposed by A.R

  • Dysgraphia in Russian are more common than cases of acquired dyslexia, possibly because of the relatively transparent mappings between print and sound in Russian, with more unpredictable mappings from sound to print needed for writing [25]

  • Languages with transparent writing systems are of interest because it was assumed that disorders of reading and writing would not exist [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The theory of dynamic and systematic localization of higher mental functions proposed by A.R. Luria dominates Russian neuropsychology in the present day This reflects the syndrome approach in aphasia originating from the classical writings of Broca, Wernicke and Dejerine. The cognitive neuropsychological approach is the dominant paradigm to explain writing difficulties in English. This paradigm is proven to be a useful approach in the assessment and rehabilitation of aphasia, it is not yet being implemented in Russia in the clinic or the laboratory. We will review the theoretical assumptions, structure and clinical implications of the classical approach and the cognitive neuropsychological approach in relation to writing. We will discuss writing disorders in Russian described by Luria and his followers identifying the aspects of Luria’s model that may potentially enrich the cognitive neuropsychological approach

The classical approach
Cognitive neuropsychological approach
Comparing the syndrome and cognitive neuropsychological approaches
Luria’s approach
Cognitive components of writing in Luria’s framework
Cognitive structure of spontaneous writing and naming
Disorders of writing
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.