Abstract

PurposePlacebo effects are presumed to be based on one’s expectations and previous experience with regard to a specific treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the specificity and valence of memories and expectations with regard to itch in experimentally induced placebo and nocebo itch responses. It was expected that cognitive schemas with more general and more negative memories and expectations with regard to itch contribute to less placebo itch responding. MethodsValidated memory tasks (ie, the Autobiographical Memory Test and the Self-referential Endorsement and Recall Task) and expectation tasks (ie, Future Event Task and the Self-referential Endorsement and Recall Task) were modified for physical symptoms, including itch. Specificity and valence of memories and expectations were assessed prior to a placebo experiment in which expectations regarding electrical itch stimuli were induced in healthy participants. FindingsParticipants who were more specific in their memories regarding itch and who had lesser negative itch-related expectations for the future were more likely to be placebo itch responders. There were no significant differences in effects between the nocebo responders and nonresponders. ImplicationsThe adapted tasks for assessing cognitive (memory and expectations) schemas on itch seem promising in explaining interindividual differences in placebo itch responding. Future research should investigate whether similar mechanisms apply to patients with chronic itch. This knowledge can be used for identifying patients who will benefit most from the placebo component of a treatment.

Highlights

  • Placebo and nocebo effects are known to contribute to overall treatment outcomes in various conditions and symptoms.[1]

  • The findings from the present study suggest that healthy participants’ cognitive schemas regarding specificity and valence of memories and expectations for itch are related to placebo responding on itch

  • No significant results were found with regard to specificity and valence of cognitive schemas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Placebo and nocebo effects are known to contribute to overall treatment outcomes in various conditions and symptoms (eg, pain, itch).[1] Whereas it is known that specific learning mechanisms (eg, conditioning) in general can result in placebo and nocebo effects, placebo and nocebo responses vary tremendously among individuals.[2,3] In both experimental and clinical studies, individuals’ placebo or nocebo responses have been shown to range from no effect to profound changes in symptoms or disease outcomes.[4,5] Several studies have.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call