Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the cognitive processes of English as second language (L2) learners that are involved in their task-based pragmatic performances in academic settings. This study, therefore, examined the cognitive processes of 30 English L2 learners when engaging in various role-play-based pragmatic performances, such as requesting a recommendation letter from a professor and negotiating an agreeable meeting time with classmates. The qualitative analyses of the retrospective verbal reports (RVRs) data of the participants indicated that the learners employed a series of cognitive, metacognitive, and pragmatic strategies when accomplishing various speech acts (e.g., requests and refusals). This study hoped to make two new contributions to the field. First, the study provided empirical evidence to validate the theoretical taxonomy of the strategy use of learners in L2 pragmatics. Additionally, the theoretical foundations of current research on cognitive processes are primarily informed by pragmatic theories. Thus, the study aims to explicate a more comprehensive view of the cognitive processes of L2 learners in pragmatic performances by employing the theories from both pragmatic and learner strategy perspectives.

Highlights

  • IntroductionVarious communicative language ability models (see Canale and Swain, 1980; Bachman and Palmer, 1996, 2010) have suggested that language ability includes both language knowledge and strategic competence (e.g., the metacognitive and cognitive strategies of L2 learners)

  • Various communicative language ability models have suggested that language ability includes both language knowledge and strategic competence

  • This study investigated the cognitive processes of L2 learners that are involved in role-play-based pragmatic performances in order to reveal these cognitive processes more accurately

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various communicative language ability models (see Canale and Swain, 1980; Bachman and Palmer, 1996, 2010) have suggested that language ability includes both language knowledge and strategic competence (e.g., the metacognitive and cognitive strategies of L2 learners). These strategies are “conscious or semi-conscious thoughts and actions deployed by learners, often with the intention of enhancing their knowledge of, and facility with an L2” Such research would yield more information about the reasons underlying language choices and productions related to pragmatic competence (Gass and Mackey, 2000; Li and Gao, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call