Abstract

There may be no property of human communication more widely recognized than the fact that interpersonal messages function in the service of multiple social goals. Despite this, relatively little is known of the encoding processes that give rise to such messages. One effort to specify these processes is found in the work of Greene and Lindsey (1989) who draw on action assembly theory in positing a model of the structures and processes involved in production of multiple‐goal messages. These authors suggest that the increased cognitive load accompanying multiple‐goal messages arises from difficulties in assembling, or integrating, incompatible message features. This paper reports two empirical investigations designed to examine the plausibility of Greene and Lindsey's account. Experiment 1 revealed that, relative to messages aimed at accomplishing two compatible social ends, messages produced in pursuit of incompatible goals were characterized by greater pause‐phonation ratios and longer average pause durati...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.