Abstract

Two classes of cognitive mechanisms have been proposed to explain segmentation of continuous sensory input into discrete recurrent constituents: clustering and boundary-finding mechanisms. Clustering mechanisms are based on identifying frequently co-occurring elements and merging them together as parts that form a single constituent. Bracketing (or boundary-finding) mechanisms work by identifying rarely co-occurring elements that correspond to the boundaries between discrete constituents. In a series of behavioral experiments, I tested which mechanisms are at play in the visual modality both during segmentation of a continuous syllabic sequence into discrete word-like constituents and during recognition of segmented constituents. Additionally, I explored conscious awareness of the products of statistical learning—whole constituents versus merged clusters of smaller subunits. My results suggest that both online segmentation and offline recognition of extracted constituents rely on detecting frequently co-occurring elements, a process likely based on associative memory. However, people are more aware of having learnt whole tokens than of recurrent composite clusters.

Highlights

  • Sensory input is continuous, cognitive systems operate on discrete constituents

  • Segmentation is based on statistical learning, the process of detecting statistical regularities in continuous sensory input in order to structure this input into processable units

  • Statistical learning mechanisms operate across all modalities; and across domains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sensory input is continuous, cognitive systems operate on discrete constituents. It may be suggested that nonwords were rejected because they violated learnt statistical regularities, phantoms were endorsed based on statistical congruency with learnt regularities, while the higher acceptance rate for words than phantoms can be explained by the facilitatory effect of memory representations of whole triplets as words, presumably extracted and committed to memory as discrete constituents during the learning stage.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call