Abstract

ObjectiveReliable identification of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is of utmost importance, as it is associated with poor outcomes including dialysis withdrawal and death. High prevalence of cognitive impairment has been demonstrated in several studies using brief screening instruments or neuropsychological test batteries. However, the relevance of cognitive impairment as well as the accuracy of screening procedures have never been studied in this patient population.Methods151 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean age 65.78 ± 14.88 years, 73,5% male) underwent cognitive testing under standardized conditions by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and, in a second step, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), an international standard to measure the severity of dementia. For calculating MoCA cut-off values on the basis of the CDR global score, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and c-statistic were applied.Results49.0% of patients were categorized as 0.5 in the CDR global with memory being the predominantly affected domain (47.7% of patients scored ≥ 0.5). Youden’s Index led to a threshold of 23.5 points for the MoCA test for optimal differentiation between cognitively normal (CDR global < 0.5) and impaired patients (CDR global ≥ 0.5) based on a sensitivity of approximately 99% and a specificity of approximately 74%.ConclusionInterference of cognitive impairment with patients’ independence and daily life was shown using the CDR for the first time in hemodialysis patients. A MoCA score of 23.5 points turned out as optimal threshold to differentiate between patients with and without functional impairment in the CDR, thereby paving the way for implementation of the MoCA test as a quick and thus highly feasible screening instrument for periodic testing in clinical routine.

Highlights

  • Several studies demonstrated high prevalence of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients [1,2,3] as well as its potential adverse effects on management and outcome including interference with informed decision making, capacity for self-care and adherence to medical, fluid and dietary instructions [4,5]

  • A Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 23.5 points turned out as optimal threshold to differentiate between patients with and without functional impairment in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), thereby paving the way for implementation of the MoCA test as a quick and highly feasible screening instrument for periodic testing in clinical routine

  • One study validated a short screening instrument, the MoCA, identifying a cut-off of 24 points to be more suitable to detect cognitive impairment compared to the established value of 26 points [12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies demonstrated high prevalence of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients [1,2,3] as well as its potential adverse effects on management and outcome including interference with informed decision making, capacity for self-care and adherence to medical, fluid and dietary instructions [4,5]. Periodic screening is needed to identify patients with relevant cognitive impairment in order to improve their clinical care as well as to reduce health care costs. In this context, a short screening instrument is the most resource-efficient option, which has to be precise in identifying impaired patients as well as those in need for further evaluation. One study validated a short screening instrument, the MoCA, identifying a cut-off of 24 points to be more suitable to detect cognitive impairment compared to the established value of 26 points [12]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.