Abstract

The decline of working memory (WM) is a common feature of general cognitive decline, and visual and verbal WM capacity appear to decline at different rates with age. Visual material may be remembered via verbal codes or visual traces, or both. Souza and Skóra, Cognition, 166, 277–297 (2017) found that labeling boosted memory in younger adults by activating categorical visual long-term memory (LTM) knowledge. Here, we replicated this and tested whether it held in healthy older adults. We compared performance in silence, under instructed overt labeling (participants were asked to say color names out loud), and articulatory suppression (repeating irrelevant syllables to prevent labeling) in the delayed estimation paradigm. Overt labeling improved memory performance in both age groups. However, comparing the effect of overt labeling and suppression on the number of coarse, categorical representations in the two age groups suggested that older adults used verbal labels subvocally more than younger adults, when performing the task in silence. Older adults also appeared to benefit from labels differently than younger adults. In younger adults labeling appeared to improve visual, continuous memory, suggesting that labels activated visual LTM representations. However, for older adults, labels did not appear to enhance visual, continuous representations, but instead boosted memory via additional verbal (categorical) memory traces. These results challenged the assumption that visual memory paradigms measure the same cognitive ability in younger and older adults, and highlighted the importance of controlling differences in age-related strategic preferences in visual memory tasks.

Highlights

  • The decline of working memory (WM) is a common feature of general cognitive decline, and visual and verbal WM capacity appear to decline at different rates with age

  • Verbal labeling strategies in the silence block were not reported to different extents by younger (76%) and older adults (70%); χ2(1, N = 60) = 0.34, p =

  • Following evidence that verbal labeling improved visual WM performance by boosting the number of categorical and continuous representations, as well as precision of continuous representations in young adults (Souza & Skóra, 2017), we investigated if labeling would have a similar effect in healthy older adults

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The decline of working memory (WM) is a common feature of general cognitive decline, and visual and verbal WM capacity appear to decline at different rates with age. For older adults, labels did not appear to enhance visual, continuous representations, but instead boosted memory via additional verbal (categorical) memory traces These results challenged the assumption that visual memory paradigms measure the same cognitive ability in younger and older adults, and highlighted the importance of controlling differences in age-related strategic preferences in visual memory tasks. Neuroscience evidence supports the notion that individual participants generate visual, phonological and semantic mental codes when viewing visual stimuli (Lewis-Peacock et al, 2014) Despite this tendency to translate visual representations into verbal codes, visual and verbal WM are typically measured separately, and a given task is assumed to measure one or the other, despite evidence that both verbal and visual codes might be stored for visually presented material (e.g., Logie, 2018; Logie, Saito, Morita, Varma, & Norris, 2016; Paivio, 1971; Saito, Logie, Morita, & Law, 2008). The limits of visual WM and its decline with age are often investigated while attempting to prevent verbal labeling using concurrent articulatory suppression (i.e., repeating nonsense syllables out loud during the encoding and/or retention period; Allen, Baddeley, & Hitch, 2006; Hollingworth & Rasmussen, 2010; Logie, Brockmole, & Vandenbroucke, 2009; Matsukura & Hollingworth, 2011; van Lamsweerde & Beck, 2012), or assumed to be prevented by presenting items very briefly

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call