Abstract

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a wide-spread and feared side-effect of conventional or even robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) due to its high impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). Non-modifiable risk factors for UI have already been identified – on surgical and patient side. Yet, to our knowledge, focus thus far has not been placed on functional aspects regarding general cognitive ability.Materials and Methods: This is an observational single-center, prospective, double-blinded evaluation of 109 RALPs performed between 07/2020 and 03/2021. All patients underwent a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) prior to surgery to evaluate their cognitive ability. Early post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) was evaluated using a standardized 1 h pad test performed 24 h after removal of the urinary catheter. The association between MMSE results and PPI were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.Results: Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified MMSE results and nerve sparing (NS) as independent predictors for PPI in patients with an intermediate MMSE result (25–27 points) having a 3.17 times higher risk of PPI when compared to patients with a good MMSE result (≥28) (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.22–9.06, p = 0.023), while patients without NS had a 3.53 times higher risk of PPI when compared to patients with NS (95% CI: 1.54–11.09, p = 0.006).Conclusion: A lower cognitive ability should be treated as a non-modifiable risk-factor for early PPI. In the future it could find its place as a clinical screening tool to identify patients who require more attention especially in the pre-, but also in the postoperative phase.

Highlights

  • Urinary incontinence (UI) is a wide-spread and feared side-effect of conventional or even robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) due to its high impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL)

  • We suggest that there are further aspects aside from the already proven non-modifiable risk-factors, patient- and surgical-sited, which influence the outcome of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy

  • This study prospectively evaluates a possible correlation between cognitive ability and early post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after RALP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a wide-spread and feared side-effect of conventional or even robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) due to its high impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL). Despite developments toward less invasive procedures, as seen in the progressive establishment of the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), relevant side effects, such as urinary incontinence (UI) still occur. UI is one of the most pertinent unwanted effects after RALP as it has a substantial impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and on their lifestyles overall [1]. Better visualization and performance of accurate incisions in a very narrowed surgical field as well as the enlarged view are some of the many propagated advantages of robotassisted surgeries in comparison to open approaches. The preservation of the external urethral sphincter can be performed more safely than when using a retropubic approach. A better outcome regarding UI in RALPs compared to open surgery is yet to be proven [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call