Abstract

Achieving goals for conservation and sustainability using nature, decision-making, and policy planning requires accurate modes of description to understand the relationship between society and the environment. Despite most planning strategies being constrained by policy objectives, planning is expected to be more participatory and inclusive of the plurality of values and all types of socio-spatial relationships. Based on Lefebvre's social theory, the objectives of this work are to propose a triad of spaces as a helpful framework to analyse nature's contributions to people (NCP), describe different spaces socially constructed by coffee and potato farmer communities in Colombia, and explore the implications for various kinds of decision-making. Using qualitative research methods, this manuscript describes three spaces:lived spacesas intangible spaces based on local, religious, and ceremonial values of NCP;perceived spacesinclude farmer spatial organization according to the ties of kinship and the downward course of streams, the incidence of negative NCP, such as plant diseases, and types of management crops; andconceived spacesas the overlapping of different spatial views of territorial planning. Given that NCP has great potential to integrate diversity of values about nature and cultural contexts into decision-making, the triad of social spaces offers a spatial dimension to the analyses of NCP. Lived spaces make non-material NCP and non-instrumental values more visible. Perceived spaces highlight material NCP and regulating NCP with the view that maintenance of NCP in the future is essential for relational and instrumental values, e.g., how material NCP and regulating NCP of landscapes are perceived and by whom. Conceived spaces emphasize the predominance of the intrinsic biophysical values of NCP. Thus, the triad of social spaces as a conceptual framework can be useful in the operationalization of NCP in environmental management, the governance of schemes, and the implementation of land-use plans at the local scale. By thinking of these spaces relationally, such insight can inform and enhance decisions and policymaking about the value of places toward the priorities of meeting management. The results of the study emphasize the important policy implications of recognizinglivedandperceivedspaces in decision-making and highlight the role of NCP in facilitating the communication of these spaces to support spatial management of land use.

Highlights

  • An important and yet unresolved question in land-use planning is how best to manage nature and their associated contributions for individuals and society to ensure a good quality of life

  • Nonmaterial nature’s contributions to people (NCP) from farms are experienced by growers since as sacred spaces where production modes cohabit with religious symbols of Christianity

  • This article analysed two case studies to show how diverse values ascribed to NCP delineate social spaces based on place-based relationships

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important and yet unresolved question in land-use planning is how best to manage nature and their associated contributions for individuals and society to ensure a good quality of life. This study integrates the NCP framework with Lefebvre’s conceptual triad of social spaces (1991) to examine how the space acquires meanings and values and disentangle the importance of multiple “living relationships” that people maintain with places (Basso, 1996), including power relations among people. It highlights how land is imbued with cultural values (Turner, 2005) and the dynamic, changing, historical, and dialectical people-place relationships (Cronon, 1985)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call