Coercion and Consensus Theories: Some Unresolved Issues

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessCommentary and DebateCoercion and Consensus Theories: Some Unresolved IssuesBert N. AdamsBert N. Adams Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 71, Number 6May, 1966 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/224227 Views: 39Total views on this site Citations: 24Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1966 University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Caroline Harmon-Darrow Conflict Resolution Interventions and Tertiary Violence Prevention Among Urban Nonintimate Adults: A Review of the Literature, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 23, no.11 (Apr 2020): 3–19.https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020918672Caroline Harmon‐Darrow, Lorig Charkoudian, Tracee Ford, Michele Ennis, Erricka Bridgeford Defining Inclusive mediation: Theory, practice, and research, Conflict Resolution Quarterly 37, no.44 (Mar 2020): 305–324.https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21279Antonella Bobbio, Karin Arbach, Thuy Nguyen Vo Psychometric Properties of the CTS2-Argentinean Version, Partner Abuse 10, no.11 (Jan 2019): 77–97.https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.1.77Harriet Chapman, Steven M. Gillespie The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): A review of the properties, reliability, and validity of the CTS2 as a measure of partner abuse in community and clinical samples, Aggression and Violent Behavior 44 (Jan 2019): 27–35.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.006Fumie Kumagai Introduction: Toward a Better Understanding of Family Violence in Japan, (Feb 2016): 1–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0057-7_1Zeev Winstok, Ronit Smadar-Dror Sanctions as a Tactic Used in Partner Conflicts, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30, no.1212 (Oct 2014): 1998–2037.https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552277Zeev Winstok From a Static to a Dynamic Approach to the Study of Partner Violence, Sex Roles 69, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2013): 193–204.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0278-z Bibliography, (Apr 2014): 235–266.https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737000918.235Zeev Winstok Gender Differences in Aggressive Tendencies, (Jul 2012): 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4568-5_1Zeev Winstok The paradigmatic cleavage on gender differences in partner violence perpetration and victimization, Aggression and Violent Behavior 16, no.44 (Jul 2011): 303–311.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.004 Nonphysical Child Abuse: A Review of Literature and Challenge to Communication Scholars, (Mar 2009): 15–48.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613790-5Esther Calvete, Susana Corral, Ana Estévez Factor Structure and Validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish Women, Violence Against Women 13, no.1010 (Oct 2007): 1072–1087.https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207305933Zeev Winstok Toward an interactional perspective on intimate partner violence, Aggression and Violent Behavior 12, no.33 (May 2007): 348–363.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.12.001Michael E. Reichenheim, Ruben Klein, Claudia Leite Moraes, , Assessing the physical violence component of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales when used in heterosexual couples: an item response theory analysis, Cadernos de Saúde Pública 23, no.11 (Jan 2007): 53–62.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007000100007Wendy M. Morgan, Steven R. Wilson Chapter 1: Nonphysical Child Abuse: A Review of Literature and Challenge to Communication Scholars, Communication Yearbook 29, no.11 (Jan 2005): 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy2901_1Rae R. Newton, Cynthia Donaldson Connelly, John A. Landsverk An Examination of Measurement Characteristics and Factorial Validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement 61, no.22 (Apr 2001): 317–335.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612011Jan Ajzner Marxist Axioms as Self-Contradictory Parsonian Statements in Sociology, Human Studies 23, no.22 (Apr 2000): 157–178.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005638003419Murray A Straus, Sherry L Hamby, David Finkelhor, David W Moore, Desmond Runyan Identification of Child Maltreatment With the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and Psychometric Data for a National Sample of American Parents, Child Abuse & Neglect 22, no.44 (Apr 1998): 249–270.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9T. Brian Pretorius The Quality of Dyadic Relationships and the Experience of Social Support, South African Journal of Psychology 27, no.33 (Aug 2016): 171–174.https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639702700307Lawrence J. Prelli Empirical Diversity, Interdependence, and the Problem of Rhetorical Invention and Judgment: The Case of Wife Abuse Facts, Communication Theory 6, no.44 (Nov 1996): 406–429.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00139.xMURRAY A. STRAUS, SHERRY L. HAMBY, SUE BONEY-McCOY, DAVID B. SUGARMAN The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), Journal of Family Issues 17, no.33 (May 1996): 283–316.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001Jeffrey C. Jacob Theories of Social and Educational Inequality: from dichotomy to typology, British Journal of Sociology of Education 2, no.11 (Jul 2006): 71–89.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569810020105Lewis A. Coser Introduction, Journal of Social Issues 28, no.11 (Jan 1972): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00001.xJoseph W. Rogers A Study of Role Consensus Using the Gamma Statistic*, The Sociological Quarterly 9, no.44 (Sep 1968): 504–515.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1968.tb01073.x